Choice of Production Methods Essay Example for Free

Choice of Production Methods Essay The following factors will influence whether a business adopts one of the four methods of production considered that is job, batch, flow or flow production with the development to mass customization. †¢ If the market is very small, such as for designer clothes, then job production is likely to be used. Flow production is most efficiently adopted when the market for similar or identical products is very large and consistent throughout the year. If mass production is used in this way, then mass marketing methods will also have to be adopted to sell the high output levels that can be manufactured. Even in a market for mass produced items, such as cars, there may be market niches that will allow smaller manufacturers to survive by making one-off products or batches of identical goods before changing the design or style for another model. If the market demands a large number of units, but at different times of the year, for example textbooks at the start of the academic year, then batch production might be most appropriate. †¢ A purpose-built flow production line is difficult and expensive to construct. Small firms are unlikely to be able to afford this type of investment and are more likely to use job or batch production. †¢ Large-scale flow production often requires a supply of relatively unskilled workers and a large, flat land area. Job production needs skilled crafts people. If any of these resources are unavailable, or very limited in supply, then the production method may have to be adapted to suit available resources, given the market constraint referred to above. †¢ If firms want the cost advantages of high volumes combined with the ability to make slightly different products for different markets, then mass customization would be most appropriate. As was seen above, technology is giving firms the flexibility to produce a variety of models from the one basic design and production process. Most firms do not just use one production method. It is quite common for many businesses to use all three production methods to gain the benefits that they offer. A French restaurant might have a continuous supply of staple items on the menu such as frites but make batches of a dish that can be kept hot for a long time (or even frozen and reheated easily) such as boeuf bourguignon. Specialist dishes that have to be cooked at the table, such as flambà ©s, will use job production. Standard Land Rover models are made on a line production system of mass production. Orders for military versions with special features in common will be made together in one batch. One-off orders, such as a bullet-proof, gold-plated model for an oil prince would be hand assembled and finished.

Icelandic volcanoes

Icelandic volcanoes Icelandic volcanoes have been associated with many devastating impacts, not only for the people of Iceland. Volcanic hazards tend to extend beyond Icelandic soil and travel to the opposite side of the globe, and are therefore considered worldwide hazards. This shows us that although the eruption occurred on land, the nature and volume of eruptions at mid-ocean ridges are very widespread. An example, of a volcano causing detrimental effects on a large scale was the Laki eruption of Iceland in June of 1783. There were over 1000 people that died which accounts for 25% of the population, and about half of the islands cattle and three-fourths of its sheep died. Furthermore, a large number of hectares and vegetation also perished. A great number of people and livestock died from suffocation caused by the pyroclastic flow- the most dangerous feature of volcanoes. The pyroclastic flow is extremely hot and triggers high velocity winds (exceeding wind speeds in hurricanes) within the cloud and the poisonous volatile gases which are capable of destroying all life within many miles of the volcano in a matter of minutes**. These gases include sulfur dioxide (SO2) and sulfur trioxide (SO3) which are poisonous alone, however combined with water from sulfuric acid (HCl), carbon monoxide (CO), hydrofluoric acid (HF) and boric acid (H3BO3) can kill within a matter of minutes once inhaled. People and livestock also died due to the secondary effects. The islands vegetation rapidly perished under a blanket of ash. This vegetation could not receive any sunlight to flourish as the ash which coated it blocked the sunlight. Due to a lack of vegetation widespread famine traveled across Europe and diseases surfaced due to the lack of nutrition, effecting the livestock and human inhabitants of the island. Furthermore, the haze that coverers the sky after an eruption, results from the sulfur gases reacting with water vapor, this blocks the suns rays and is therefore detrimental to both life on land and in the ocean. Volcano Laki efficiently eliminated the 1783 summer and it was the coldest in 500 years in some locations, according to tree ring data. The sun was obscured by the vast cloud caused by the Laki eruption and, what should have been a warm summer in the northern hemisphere, took on winter proportions, not just in Iceland, but all over Europe.** Poems were written that i ncluded descriptions of the sun- ‘pale blood red ghost within the volcanic haze. In reference to the laki volcano in Iceland, Benjamin Franklin during a lecture in 1784 made the following comments, when the effect of the suns rays to heat the earth in these northern regions should have been greater, there existed a constant fog all over Europe, and a great part of North America†¦this haze was also observed over Asia and North Africa. These days the haze would cease aviation over much of Europe if an eruption the capacity of Laki occurred. The haze does not only decrease visibility, but it also damages aircraft. For example, the most common result is engine damage that occurs when volcanic ash enters the jet intakes; the volcanic ash melts and cools to become glass coating the turbine blades, often causing the engines to stall. Further secondary effects included contaminated water supplies within Iceland. The water became poison due to its contact with pyroclastic flow and being supplied with acid rain. A build up of fluoride within the drinking water caused ‘fluoride poisoning which resulted in bone deformities in people and livestock evident in graveyard excavations. Volcanoes also have the capacity to interrupt the normal weather patterns not only locally, but also on a large scale. For example, in France the extreme weather resulted in a surplus harvest in 1785 that inflicted poverty upon rural workers, accompanied by droughts, bad winters and summers, involved a horrific thunderstorm and hailstorm in 1788 that damaged crops. This in turn contributed significantly to the build up of poverty and famine that triggered the French revolution in 1780. Recent computer modeling shows that the cooler temperatures in the Northern hemisphere in 1783 caused a weak monsoon for Southern Asia and Northern Africa. The unusual cold in the North lessened the temperature contrast between the land and the oceans, upon which the monsoon winds rely for their development and strength. With little or no monsoon, there are no clouds to produce rain for rivers or to prevent the surface evaporation. Without rain there was no irrigation supplied for crops and this result ed in a food shortage for these countries. The cooler weather also caused the Mississippi River to freeze and the formation of ice in the Gulf of Mexico. These unprecedented weather patterns upon Europe continued for several years Lava is another dangerous feature of volcanoes. The vent of the Laki volcano was marked by a row of lava fountains throwing red-hot molten basalt tens of meters into the air and in a single day, the front of the lava flow advanced 15km2, making it the largest historic eruption. The destructive power of lava flows lies in the high temperature of the rock, which can set structures aflame, and in the size and mass of the flow, which can engulf or crush even large buildings. One observer of the Laki volcano said ‘all the earths plants burned, withered and turned gray, one after another, as the fire increased and neared the settlements. Earthquakes can also be triggered by volcanic activity. The Earthquakes are produced by stress changes in solid rock caused by the insertion and/or removal of magma. These earthquakes can cause land to subside and can produce large ground cracks**. Furthermore, the Laki eruption was heralded by a series of earthquakes and the opening of fissures 25km long, and a shallow graben formed between two of the fissures.

Scheme of Remedies for Misrepresentation

Scheme of Remedies for Misrepresentation In pre-contractual negotiations, one party (the Representor) may make representations to another party (the Representee), which relate, by way of affirmation, denial, description or otherwise, to a statement of fact or present intention. If the representations made are untrue, they may be termed misrepresentations. The Representor may know that the statements are untrue; or they may be careless or reckless as to their truth. Alternatively, the Representor may hold an honest belief as to truth of the statements made. Generally there is no positive duty to act honestly in English Law a misrepresentation cannot be made by silence and even where one party proceeds, fully aware that the other is contracting on the basis of a misunderstanding of some fact, English law does not provide for a remedy. The exceptions are where the facts given are a half-truth, or where a statement is made, circumstances change and the maker of the statement fails to disclose this. Further exceptions are where a contract, such as one for insurance, is treated by the law as being of the utmost good faith and requiring the contracting party to disclose all relevant facts; or where the contract involves a fiduciary relationship such as between a company and its promoters. European Law, by contrast, imposes a positive duty to act in good faith and fair dealing, both during the course of negotiations and where a contract is concluded. It allows avoidance of the contract for fraudulent (deceitful) non-disclosure of information which, in accordance, with the principles of good faith and fair dealing, a party should have disclosed. The duty extends to situations where a contract is not even concluded: for example, where negotiations break down, or where one party is time wasting. This positive duty to act in good faith is common in other jurisdictions, including some common law systems. The scope of remedies for misrepresentation in English law depends on the type of misrepresentation that has occurred. Where the misrepresentation is fraudulent, the law sees the Representor as more blameworthy and the level of damages is not limited by, for example, remoteness, the duty to mitigate, and contributory negligence. The reasons for imposing wider liability on the intentional wrongdoer than on the innocent misrepresentor are certainly moral, but as Lord Steyn notes, the law and morality are inextricably interwoven and, to a large extent, the law is simply formulated and declared morality. It seems ironic, therefore, that there is no remedy whatsoever are where one party deliberately fails to disclose a material fact: an action that is intentionally dishonest, immoral and surely equally blameworthy. To be blameworthy means to be at fault or deserving of blame: from a moral standpoint, it implies conduct for which a party is guilty and deserves reproach or punishment. However, there is a logical consistency to, and a general policy of, not punishing intentional wrongdoers by civil remedies in English law: the primary remedy for civil wrongs is to provide compensatory damages, measured by the claimants loss; and the aim of providing a remedy, frequently cited, is to put the claimant into as good a position as if no wrong had occurred. However, the principles by which the remedies for fraudulent misrepresentation have developed do appear to go beyond this, having a punitive nature in their application. Fraudulent Misrepresentation Where the Representor makes a statement of fact (or a statement of intention, which involves a representation as to the existence of the intention which is itself a present fact) either knowingly, without belief in its truth, or recklessly, i.e., careless as to whether it is true or false, and this fact, being material, induces the other person to enter into the contract, this is a fraudulent misrepresentation. It does not matter that the Representee could have discovered the truth or spurned the opportunity to do so. The test as to whether fraudulent misrepresentation has taken place is whether there is an absence of honest belief; and honesty in this context refers to a subjective appreciation of events. The fact that the statement would not convince a reasonable person does not necessarily make it dishonest; however, where the statement is made recklessly or carelessly, the Court may make a finding of dishonesty, in that the person in question could not reasonably have believed in the truth of their statement. In all cases of fraudulent misrepresentation, however, dishonesty is a crucial factor damages cannot be claimed in deceit on the basis of recklessness alone since the basis of deceit is dishonesty. Where the misrepresentation is fraudulent, the Representee may rescind the contract a remedy available for nearly all types of misrepresentation and he may also recover any benefits that the Representor has enjoyed as a result of the contract being made, prior to the contract being rescinded. The Representee may also claim damages in the tort of deceit, and as noted, the damages are intended to restore the victim to the position he was in before the representation was made. The test for damages in fraud is one of direct consequence, rather than foreseeability, with damages being divided into two categories diminuation in value and consequential losses. Similar to damages for negligence, the House of Lords have confirmed that the Representor will be responsible for a sum representing the financial loss flowing directly from his alteration of position under the inducement of the fraudulent representations of the defendants. Unlike for negligence, however, the damages do not need to be foreseeable; as long as they have been caused by the transaction. This demonstrates that the Representors blameworthiness is important since the benefit of limiting liability to only foreseeable damages is not permitted to the dishonest person as it would be if the representation was made negligently: per Lord Denning in Doyle v Olby, it does not lie in the mouth of the fraudulent person to say that they could not have been reasonably foreseen. This decision was reaffirmed in Smith New Court. Further, the fact that the Representee had every opportunity to avoid the contract or transaction in question, or could have taken proceedings to rescind it, or asserted his rights to have it treated as void in proceedings brought to enforce it, does not bar his claim for damages. Once again, where dishonesty is involved, the law does not allow the misrepresentor any opportunity to reduce his liability, even where there is fault on the part of the Representee. Similarly, the contributory negligence of the Representee does not apply to reduce damages for the tort of deceit. Again, this feature has been applied because the tort involves dishonesty; regardless of the contributory negligence of the Representee, the Representor will have to pay for all damages because the law views him as blameworthy and cannot justify restricting his liability as a result of this. The Representee may also claim for consequential losses, although he is obliged to take all reasonable steps to mitigate those losses on discovery of the fraud. The type of damages that may be awarded to the Representee may include both special and general damages, as for A v B, where the claimant Representee was entitled to an award of  £7,500 in respect of general damages for distress even though his distressed state had not required medical attention. Although the potential heavier damages available to claimants may make a claim in fraudulent misrepresentation seem more attractive, it may be difficult to prove the Representors dishonesty and failure to succeed may result in an action for defamation; a claim under Section 2(1) of the Misrepresentation Act 1967 (MA1967) is more likely to be pursued for these reasons since the remedies available are similar. Negligent Misrepresentation The misrepresentation may alternatively give rise to an action for damages in the tort of negligence, if the statement is made (a) knowingly, (b) without belief in its truth or (c) recklessly, careless whether it be true or false; and a special relationship exists between the parties. A finding of dishonesty is not necessary: provided that it can be established that there is reasonable foreseeability of reliance on the statement and of the harm caused by that reliance. As established in Hedley Byrne, the Representor has a duty of care to do all that is reasonable to make sure their statement is accurate, regardless of the existence of a fiduciary or contractual relationship; only a sufficient degree of proximity between the parties is necessary for an action to be sustained. Such proximity would arise in professional relationships, such as those made with barristers and estate agents, and also in purely commercial transactions where the Representor has superior knowledge and experien ce to that of the Representee and it is reasonable for the Representee to rely on statements made by them. In all cases, it must be just and reasonable for the duty of care to be imposed. The remedies available to the Representee are rescission of the contract and damages in the tort of negligence; and, unlike a claim for fraudulent misrepresentation, damages will be subject to a test of reasonable foreseeability. The Court may however take account of benefits that the claimant has missed out on as a result of the misrepresentation. Despite the difficulties in establishing negligence, it should be noted that actions for negligent misrepresentation have the advantage that they are not limited to misrepresentations that induce contracts; nor are they limited to statements of fact. A parallel can be drawn with principles of European law, which recognise liability for losses during the process of negotiation, even if a contract is not made. However, whereas for negligent misrepresentation in English law a duty of care must be established, in European law no such duty is required. Such losses in European law include those incurred as a result of failure to act in good faith and fair dealing; a positive duty imposed on the parties, which may include failure to disclose pertinent information. Section 2(1) Misrepresentation Act 1967 More commonly, an action for misrepresentation will be made under Section 2(1) of the MA1967 where the misrepresentation results in a contract. Unlike an action in negligence, which requires the Representee to prove that a duty of care existed, the burden of proof is reversed: the Act requires that the Representors prove they had reasonable grounds to believe, and did believe up the time the contract was made, that the facts represented were true, and unless they can do this, they will be liable. This can be difficult to prove: a mere honest belief is not enough. Remedies available to the Representee are similar to those available for fraudulent misrepresentation unless the Representor is able to discharge this burden of proof (and if the Representor can discharge the burden, the Representee may still plead innocent misrepresentation with its consequent remedies). Effectively then, per Royscot Trust Ltd, damages in respect of an honest but careless representation are to be calculated as if the representation had been made fraudulently: this has attracted much criticism as it means in effect that the Courts are required to treat a person who is morally innocent as if he was guilty of fraud. However, under Section 2(1) the loss recoverable does not go beyond the consequences that arise from the negligent misrepresentation: this is narrower than the recoverable loss permitted for fraudulent misrepresentation per Doyle v Olby. In addition, unlike damages for fraudulent misrepresentation, the Court may reduce the sum if there is evidence of contributory negligence on the part of the Representee. The damages under Section 2(1) will be based on direct consequence (as for the tort of fraud/deceit) rather than what was reasonably foreseeable (as for the tort of negligence). In Royscot Trust, the Court of Appeal held that the correct measure of damages was based on the tort of deceit and that the Plaintiff was entitled to recover all losses even if those losses were unforeseeable, provided they were not otherwise too remote. Therefore, the measure for damages for innocent misrepresentation under Section 2(1) is the same measure as for fraudulent misrepresentation. This has since been questioned, however, and in Smith New Court Securities, Lord Steyn asked whether it was correct to treat a person who was morally innocent as if he were guilty of fraud when it comes to the measure of damages. This measure seems incorrect: especially as, per Avon v Swire (where representations as to the future were presented as statements as to existing intention), the section may be used to produce damages on a scale commensurate with fraud where otherwise the contract would allow no damages in the event of breach and there would be no damages for negligent misrepresentation in tort. Innocent Misrepresentation Where the statement made is innocent, in that there is no provable fault, the remedy is rescission of the contract unless the Court awards damages at its discretion under Section 2(2) MA1967; alternatively it may award rescission with an indemnity; the aim of the Court in all cases being not to unjustly enrich the Claimant. The equitable remedies that the Court may award discretionarily may include the setting aside of a deed or other instrument and the restitution of property, with any pecuniary adjustment that might be necessary on either side by way of accounting for profits or allowance for depreciation. Although there is no indication as to the level of damages, it is considered that this should be lower than the damages awarded under Section 2(1), as implied by Section 2(3). The Court exercises its discretion in accordance with the principles of equity and so there may be no remedy offered if the facts as a whole make it inequitable to grant the relief, or if there is improper conduct or suggestion of a harsh bargain on the part of the Representee. Mispresentation and blameworthiness: considerations It has been noted that misrepresentations can be made intentionally, carelessly or recklessly, or innocently. In each case, there is a remedy for the Representee; but the value of that remedy varies based on several factors. We have seen that where fraudulent misrepresentation is proved (for which dishonesty is required), the level of damages awarded may be far greater than for other types of misrepresentation: the Representor must pay all financial losses flowing directly from the misrepresentation. There are few limits to this: the damages do not need to be foreseeable and matters of the Representees conduct, such as the fact that he had the ability to avoid the contract or to discover the dishonesty, does not bar his claim. Similarly, his contributory negligence is irrelevant to the calculation of damages. The only restriction is that Representee needs to take reasonable steps to mitigate his consequential losses. Following the recent case of A v B, we have also seen that general damages may be available for distress suffered, even though this is not medical. Under the MA1967, we have seen that a Representee can claim damages on a scale commensurate with fraud even where the representation was innocent, although these will be limited by any contributory negligence. It seems unjust that the Representees contributory negligence is ignored in fraudulent misrepresentation: this is fault per se on the part of the Representee and if the reason for allowing wider damages is blameworthiness, surely the blameworthiness of the Representee must also be a consideration. The European approach of considering all circumstances, including, but not limited to, whether the Representee could reasonably acquire the information, seems fairer. The flexibility of this approach, in contrast to the unlimited scope of damages in English Law permitted for fraudulent misrepresentation, may demonstrate a better approach to the calculation of damages. The European approach may be contrasted to awards made for innocent misrepresentations in English law, which follow equitable principles; in such cases the conduct of all parties is taken into consideration before reaching a decision. The fault of both parties is balanced in order to reach a decision that is fair to both, and such a system would make a more just compromise between the heavy benefits of a successful claim for fraudulent misrepresentation. It has also been noted that it is entirely illogical that the law should take such an iron-handed approach where the Representor makes a positive statement which he knows to be incorrect; but provide no remedy whatsoever when the same person dishonestly fails to disclose a material fact that he knows would have a material bearing on the contract. James notes that the EU is taking tentative steps towards the abolition of national contract laws of member states, and the replacement with a single European code. If this happens, we will see the introduction of a positive obligation to act in good faith, both in pre-contractual negotiations and in the formation of contracts. This obligation on contracting parties to be open with each other in negotiations is foreign to English law; it has previously been avoided because of principles of contractual freedom and economic efficiency. However, a model which requires honesty and diligence on the part of both parties, and provides for remedies to either party where there is a loss to be made good, with each partys conduct assessed for fairness, seems a far more balanced approach than the present system of remedies in English law for misrepresentation, and accords more with the principle of restitutio in integrum that is inherent throughout our contract law system.

Letter From a Birminham Jail Essay -- essays research papers

Summary of â€Å"Letter from Birmingham Jail† by Martin Luther King, Jr. In Martin Luther King, Jr.’s Letter from Birmingham Jail, he responds to a letter entitled Statement by Alabama Clergymen. In King’s letter, he makes it clear that he does not usually answer letters of criticism, but because this one came from educated men he felt the need to clarify his purposes, actions, and goals of this civil rights campaign. King first states he is in Birmingham because he has affiliates there who asked him to come. His goal is to spread the word of freedom like Paul spread the Word of God. King and other African American leaders had tried to negotiate with city leaders, but only to be offered broken promises. Their only choice is to organize nonviolent campaigns and create enough tension so the city...

Lord Of The Flies :: essays research papers

Setting is the physical environment in which action occurs. It is a common literary element of every story. However, when it is used eloquently, it can be seen as brilliant device that aids in the development of a story. In the novel Lord of the Flies, the author, William Golding, focuses on depicting his setting in great detail. Throughout the novel, he utilizes the setting to motivate character behavior, foreshadow events that will take place, and also to represent the values held by the characters. At the beginning of the novel, the characters discover that they are stranded on an island with no other humans. Since all of the characters are children, they are inexperienced on how to handle grave situations. Considering they are all by themselves, their environment forcefully arranges them into two groups. One of the groups is the hunters which will go out and kill animals for food. This group must be created, otherwise, all the characters shall die. The boy who will take on this challenge will be Jack. Jack, at the beginning of the novel, was a very considerate and caring. An example of this takes place in chapter one where he is about to kill a pig but did not have the heart to do it. However as the novel proceeds, his environment, the forest, and his new role of hunter will change him to an uncaring, selfish savage. The other group that will co-exist is one that will stay behind and do non-violent work such as building huts or creating weapons. As a result of having two groups within the whole, a leader must emerge in order to keep the two groups working efficiently. Since there is no adult on the island to take on the responsibility, the character’s environment once again forces them to elect a leader. The person who is elected is Ralph. He is forced to be organized and insightful on how to keep everyone alive. This is shown through him organizing a way for people to voice their opinions in his meetings. It is also shown through him suggesting that they build shelter and appointing people to take on certain parts in that task. Golding also uses the setting in order to foreshadow events that will happen or actions of characters. At the beginning of the novel, he illustrates the island in a fashion that makes it seem heavenly.

Should Welfare Recipients Be Drug Tested

Should welfare recipients be drug tested? Welfare is supposed to meet the basic needs and drugs are far from the basic human needs. If drug using recipients get all the benefits they are more likely to take their check and spend it on their next fix, rather than buy groceries. Drug testing welfare recipients would decrease the amount of people abusing the system, it would require recipients to stay free of using drugs, and would reveal recipients who are wasting the tax payers money.It is clear that drug testing welfare recipients would benefit the system, other recipients, and tax payers. Firstly, drug testing would decrease the amount of people abusing the system. People who are drug users and refuse to stop or get help will not apply for welfare. Also, drug testing would send a message to society that abusing the system will no longer be tolerated and it would free up extra funds for families who actually need the help.Thus, drug testing welfare recipients would stop people who ar e abusing of the system. Secondly, drug testing will require recipients to stay free of using drugs. If people really need the assistance money then they will chose to either stay clean or get help to get clean. Recipients who fail the test or simply refuse to take the test will not receive an assistance check and without the welfare money people will not be able to afford drugs. Therefore, drug testing welfare recipients would help clean up illegal drug useLastly, drug testing would reveal recipients who are wasting the tax payer’s money. If the working class has to be drug tested to make their money, those receiving assistance should be drug tested to receive their check. Tax payers should not have to pay for some random person’s drug habit and if people chose to be foolish and want to do drugs they should get a job to support their bad habit. As a result, drug testing welfare recipients would reveal the people who are wasting the tax payer’s money.In conclusi on, qualifying and receiving welfare is a privilege and if the government continues to allow drug users collect welfare payment, this will show that they condone their behavior. Drug testing welfare recipients would decrease abuse to the system, require people to stay clean and reveal people who are wasting the tax payer’s money. The government should pass the law to drug test welfare recipients. Hard working, taxpaying citizen’s money is going towards helping people get back on their feet using the welfare system, and far too often people are abusing the system to pay for and support their drug habits.

Hunger Games Character Paper

The Hunger Games- Character Paper I read the book The Hunger Games by Suzanne Collins. The book is about the future and how the central government overrules all of districts, Panem. The main character of the book is Katniss Everdeen. She is a teenage girl who lives in â€Å"District 12†. Her district is known for all the coal mining; she had lost her father when she was younger in mine explosion.After this she had to step up and be the adult. She is very brave and she is very smart. Katniss, the story's narrator and heroine, is 16 years old and has straight black hair, gray eyes, and olive skin. Her father died in a mine explosion when she is 11. Since then, to keep her family from starving in the Seam, she has had to provide for her mother and sister, using the hunting and gathering knowledge that her father taught her.Her best friend and hunting partner is Gale, and, while they spend a great deal of time together, Katniss is sure that she doesn't see him in a romantic light, something that comes into deep question when she is District 12's Hunger Games tribute and must work hard to maintain a star-crossed-lovers facade with Peeta Mellark. Throughout the novel, she remains a hunter and a survivor, â€Å"the girl on fire,† but she is also a girl who is very confused about her emotions concerning Peeta and Gale.Katniss must also remember to hide her true emotions about the Capitol: She loathes the Capitol and its tyrannical rule, but to rebel openly is to ask for punishment, oftentimes death. She is brave and daring and returns home from the Games a beloved star to her district but a menace to the Capitol dictators in charge of Panem. Katniss is very relatable to young girls because of her confusion with boys. This makes Katniss a great main character for the book because who doesn’t love a science fiction book with a relatable main character?